Verse explainer
The oil isn't the point — the prayer is. And this isn't the origin of last rites.
Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:
BSBIs any one of you sick? He should call the elders of the church to pray over him and anoint him with oil in the name of the Lord.
The plain meaning
James is writing to a community that knew oil as ordinary medicine — it was the ibuprofen of the ancient Near East, routinely carried on journeys and applied to wounds and illness (see the Good Samaritan, Luke 10:34). When James tells the sick to call the elders, he is urging them to seek both natural care and earnest communal prayer together, not to wait for a miraculous ceremony. The very next verse (v. 15) locates the healing power not in the oil but in 'the prayer of faith.' The elders represent the gathered church — their praying over the sick is the whole congregation interceding. This has nothing to do with the Roman Catholic sacrament of extreme unction, which is administered to the dying for spiritual healing; James is describing a practice aimed at physical recovery while the person is still ill. The phrase 'in the name of the Lord' signals that any healing comes from Christ, with the elders as instruments, not sources.
The common misreading
What the commentators say
Clarke argues at length that the oil here is a natural medicinal remedy, not a sacramental rite. He notes that oil was universally used in Judea and across the East for healing wounds and serious illness, and that James simply directs the sick to combine this ordinary medicine with prayer to God — neither neglecting natural means nor trusting them without faith. Clarke is emphatic that this bears no resemblance to extreme unction, which is applied to the dying, not to those who might recover.
Gill reads the anointing as tied to an extraordinary apostolic gift of healing that has since ceased, making the rite itself obsolete — though the call to prayer by the elders remains binding. He notes the Jewish background: rabbinical tradition held that wise men should be sought in sickness to intercede, and the elders here carry that intercessory role. He also sharply distinguishes this passage from Roman Catholic extreme unction on every relevant point: timing, purpose, and expectation.
JFB emphasizes that calling 'the elders' (plural) means the whole church is effectively praying through its representatives — this is communal intercession, not a private priestly act. They note that oil was both a curative agent in Jewish practice and a symbol of divine grace, making it a fitting outward sign for miraculous healing in the apostolic era. Now that miraculous gifts have largely ceased, they argue, using the sign without the reality it once signified would be empty superstition.
The word behind it
"Elders" — the plural accusative of presbyteros, meaning an older, senior person, and by extension a recognized leader or officer of the congregation. The fact that James says 'the elders' (plural) rather than a single priest is significant: this is a communal act, not a priestly sacrament administered by one person. The same word gives us 'presbyter' and 'priest' in later church usage, but in James the emphasis is on representative community prayer, not sacerdotal office.
Related verses