Verse explainer

What does 1 Corinthians 15:3 really mean?

Paul isn't offering his own theology — he's handing on a creed he received, and he calls it the first-importance core of the gospel.

KJV

For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures;

BSB

For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures,

The plain meaning

The verse opens a short, formal summary that scholars recognize as one of the earliest Christian creeds — likely predating even this letter (written c. AD 55). Paul's phrasing is deliberate: "I received … I passed on" is the technical Jewish language for handing down authoritative tradition intact. The phrase rendered "first of all" (Greek: en prōtois) doesn't mean merely "first in sequence" but "among the things of chief importance" — a priority claim, not just a chronological one. Two things are being asserted simultaneously: that Christ's death was a real, historical event, and that it carried a specific meaning — it was "for our sins," not an accident of Roman politics. Then Paul anchors both claims in the Old Testament: "according to the Scriptures." He's saying this wasn't improvised; it was the culmination of a long story already told. Verse 4 continues the creed — burial, resurrection, appearances — and the whole passage through v. 8 is Paul's argument that the resurrection is inseparable from this same received tradition.

The common misreading

"Died for our sins" means Jesus was punished by God in our place — full stop, no nuance. The substitution reading is common and not entirely wrong — Paul does mean Christ's death dealt with sin on our behalf — but the verse is doing something more specific that often gets lost. First, the phrase "for our sins" (Greek: hyper tōn hamartiōn hēmōn) carries the sense of "in behalf of" or "for the sake of," which is broader than a single theory of exactly how that works. As Jamieson, Fausset & Brown note, this particular Greek construction doesn't by itself lock in one precise mechanism of atonement. Second, and more importantly, Paul immediately attaches the clause "according to the Scriptures" — which points readers back to texts like Isaiah 53 and the Passover typology. He's saying the meaning of the death was encoded in a long scriptural story, not just in a single legal transaction. Third, the verse is part of a received creed, not a doctrinal treatise. People who stop at v. 3 and treat it as a complete systematic statement miss that Paul's main argument in chapter 15 is about the resurrection — the death is the premise, but resurrection is the point. Stripping v. 3 from its context turns a link in a chain into the whole chain.

What the commentators say

Adam Clarkeearly 19th c. · PD

Clarke stresses that "first of all" (en prōtois) signals these are chief matters, fundamental truths — not merely the opening item in a list. He also emphasizes that Paul received this doctrine by direct revelation from God, not from human tradition, making the delivery all the more authoritative. For Clarke, Christ's vicarious death for sin is explicitly "among the things of chief importance" and essential to the gospel scheme.

John Gill18th c. · PD

Gill reads the passage as Paul faithfully transmitting what he himself had received from Christ — the standard a gospel minister must follow: deliver nothing more and nothing less than what was received. He underscores that Christ died not for his own sins but for the sins of his people, in order to atone, pardon, and abolish them — and that every promise, type, and prophecy in Moses, the prophets, and the Psalms found their precise fulfillment here.

Jamieson, Fausset & Brown19th c. · PD

JFB notes that this compact summary resembles an early creed formula, likely used at baptism, and that Paul places the atonement as primary in his theological framework. They observe that Paul ranks the testimony of Scripture above even eyewitness appearances of the risen Christ — pointing to Isaiah 53 and Daniel 9:26 as the scriptural backbone behind the claim that Christ's death was both foreseen and purposeful.

The word behind it

παρέδωκα paredōka

"I delivered" or "I passed on" — from paradidōmi, the standard Greek verb for the formal transmission of authoritative tradition. The matching term "I received" (parelabon) completes a technical pair used in both Jewish rabbinic and early Christian contexts for handing down teaching without alteration. The choice of words signals Paul is not innovating; he is a link in a chain, and the chain predates him.

Related verses